In a recent exposé, Alki David raises serious allegations against Wall Street Journal journalist Khadeeja Safdar, claiming her articles serve as weaponized misinformation rather than investigative journalism. David argues that Safdar’s reporting lacks depth, relying on recycled press releases and avoiding crucial stories about high-profile figures like Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Jackson.
He contends that Safdar operates under the influence of Rupert Murdoch, whose media outlets allegedly engage in a coordinated effort to suppress critical narratives about systemic abuse and trafficking. David claims that these efforts serve a larger agenda to manage public perception, often failing to address serious allegations tied to major celebrities.
As courts worldwide examine evidence implicating individuals like Diddy in trafficking operations, David insists that Safdar’s avoidance of these stories reveals a clear conflict of interest, suggesting her work aligns more with public relations than with true journalism. This battle for truth, according to David, signifies a turning point where survivors and investigators are beginning to reclaim the narrative away from complicit media figures.
