Skip to main content
SnapScope

U.N. Court Dismisses Sudan's Genocide Claims Against U.A.E.

The International Court of Justice has ruled that it lacks jurisdiction on Sudan's allegations involving the U.A.E. amidst ongoing civil conflict.

By Ismaeel Naar and Abdi Latif DahirSource: nytimes.com1 min read
U.N. Court Dismisses Sudan's Genocide Claims Against U.A.E.
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

The case highlights the ongoing struggle and accusations in Sudan's civil war, focusing on military support and international law.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has made a significant ruling, dismissing allegations by Sudan that the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.) is aiding genocide in the nation’s civil war. The court concluded that it "manifestly lacks jurisdiction" to hear the case, with a vote of 14-2 against Sudan's requests for initial emergency measures. Although both nations signed the 1948 Genocide Convention, the U.A.E. had previously opted out of a critical clause permitting legal action in the ICJ.In March, Sudan's government claimed that the U.A.E. funded and armed the Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary group engaged in conflict against Sudan's military. During the court's initial hearings, Sudan sought orders to compel the U.A.E. to cease support for the R.S.F. and halt actions that could harm the Masalit people in Darfur. However, the Emirati government maintained that these accusations were baseless and contested the court's authority to adjudicate.

Topics

More on this story