In a tumultuous real-life echo of the HBO series "Succession," Rupert Murdoch's bid to reshape a family trust and pass control of his media empire to son Lachlan has been thwarted by a Nevada court. The 93-year-old media mogul's request aimed to amend a 1999 family trust, ensuring Lachlan could take the reins of News Corp and Fox News without his siblings' interference. However, the court found that Murdoch and Lachlan acted in "bad faith," describing their approach as a "carefully crafted charade."

In light of the ruling, Murdoch’s other children—Prudence, Elisabeth, and James—expressed their relief, hoping to move past the legal battles to rebuild familial relationships. Expressing disappointment, Murdoch's attorney indicated plans to appeal the decision, while discussions among family about succession were noted to have intensified following a dramatic episode of the TV series.

The sealed court proceedings highlighted the significance of confidentiality in such sensitive matters, further reflecting the intricate and often tumultuous dynamics within the Murdoch family. With power struggles at the forefront, this court ruling is a pivotal moment that shapes the future of the Murdoch legacy.