Skip to main content
SnapScope
PoliticsUnited States

Court Rules Elephants Are Not "People" in Landmark Case

A Colorado court rejects a bid to move five elephants from a zoo to a sanctuary.

Source: bbc.co.uk1 min read
Court Rules Elephants Are Not "People" in Landmark Case
Image via bbc.co.uk

In brief

In a significant ruling, the Colorado Supreme Court determined that elephants do not possess the same legal rights as humans, denying a petition from an animal rights group.

The Colorado Supreme Court recently ruled that five elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo are not considered "people" under the law. An animal rights group, the Nonhuman Rights Project (NRP), had petitioned to move the elephants—Missy, Kimba, Lucky, LouLou, and Jambo—to an elephant sanctuary, arguing that their current captivity equated to imprisonment. The court's unanimous 6-0 decision relied on distinctions between animals and humans, concluding that the state's habeas corpus process applies only to legal persons. Justice Maria Berkenkotter acknowledged the elephants' intelligence and emotional traits yet maintained that they do not possess personhood rights. Despite NRP’s claims that the elephants showed signs of stress and trauma from their captivity, the zoo defended its care, labeling the lawsuit as frivolous and a misuse of the legal system. Following the ruling, NRP decried the decision as an injustice, emphasizing their long-term goal to challenge societal norms regarding animal rights. Similar previous attempts to grant legal status to animals have faced setbacks, including an earlier effort to free an elephant named Happy from the Bronx Zoo.

Topics

More on this story