Groundbreaking DNA analysis of Adolf Hitler's blood has uncovered some extraordinary findings about the dictator's ancestry and possible health conditions. Painstaking scientific testing by a team of international experts has been able to debunk a rumor on whether Hitler had Jewish ancestry (he didn't) and determine that he had a genetic disorder which affects the development of sexual organs - all from an old blood-stained swatch of fabric.
While clickbait headlines have focused on whether the Nazi dictator had a micropenis and only one testicle, more serious are the findings that his DNA showed very high scores - in the top 1% - for a predisposition to autism, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Does this mean he had these neurological conditions? Absolutely not, say the experts - it's not a diagnosis.
Nevertheless, concerns have been raised about stigmatization and how ethical the research was, prompting the question - should it have been done at all? I agonized over it, says Prof Turi King within the first few minutes of Saturday's Channel 4 documentary on the research, *Hitler's DNA: Blueprint of a Dictator*.
The genetics expert told the BBC that when she was first approached to take part in the project several years ago, she was very aware of the potential implications of studying the DNA of someone like Adolf Hitler - I'm not interested in sensationalizing things. However, she concluded that the research was likely to be conducted eventually and preferred to ensure its academic rigor and ethical standards.
The bloodied swatch of fabric - now 80 years old - was cut out of the sofa in Hitler's underground bunker, where he took his own life as Allied forces approached Berlin. The scientists have confirmed its authenticity by matching the Y-chromosome with a DNA sample from a male relative collected a decade ago.
While the documentary shows the findings as fascinating, it raises ethical questions around studying Hitler's DNA posthumously without personal consent. Some claim that such investigations could detract from the real lessons of history, while others argue that it’s an essential step towards understanding historical extremism. As the debate continues, both excitement and caution surround the implications of these scientific discoveries.