In a shocking twist for democracy in Mexico, the nationwide judicial election saw nearly 90% of possible voters choosing to abstain from the polls. Estimates indicate that only about 12.6% to 13.3% participated, making it one of the least engaging federal elections since the country shifted to a democratic system in the early 2000s.

The judicial election is pivotal, intending to transition from an appointment-based judiciary to one elected by the public. While supporters argue that this initiative bolsters democracy, critics claim it serves as a power grab by the leftist Morena party, led by President Claudia Sheinbaum.

Many voters were reportedly confused by the overwhelming number of candidates—nearly 2,700 positions including judges for the Supreme Court—leading to a lack of informed participation. Some voters resorted to using “cheat sheets” provided by the Morena party, raising suspicions about electoral integrity.

Experts like Laurence Pantin, who oversees the nonprofit Juicio Justo, voiced concerns about the election being manipulated, citing irregular practices such as voters entering booths in groups and taking photos of their ballots, potentially hinting at vote-buying schemes. The low turnout mirrors a growing disconnect between the electorate and their government, with many puzzled about the voting process itself.