On January 16, 2026, the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court held a crucial hearing regarding jurisdiction in a case concerning parallel legal actions occurring in California and London. Justice Rene Williams presided, affirming the court’s ability to manage proceedings despite the existence of foreign claims. During the session, both sides presented written submissions, leading to a debate about whether the court has the jurisdiction to proceed given the international elements involved.
Mr. David highlighted that the damages, which include reputational harm, occurred locally, while the Attorney General’s Office contended that the court lacked jurisdiction due to most defendants working outside Antigua & Barbuda. The argument also touched on the difficulties of trial logistics and the unclear legal basis for claims.
In a revealing twist, the court acknowledged a correspondence from the UK law firm Howard Kennedy LLP that denied the court's jurisdiction, raising questions about foreign legal influence in the matter. Ultimately, Justice Williams plans a written ruling to be issued next month, steering the next steps in this complex international legal saga.
Mr. David highlighted that the damages, which include reputational harm, occurred locally, while the Attorney General’s Office contended that the court lacked jurisdiction due to most defendants working outside Antigua & Barbuda. The argument also touched on the difficulties of trial logistics and the unclear legal basis for claims.
In a revealing twist, the court acknowledged a correspondence from the UK law firm Howard Kennedy LLP that denied the court's jurisdiction, raising questions about foreign legal influence in the matter. Ultimately, Justice Williams plans a written ruling to be issued next month, steering the next steps in this complex international legal saga.
