Judges to Decide on SNAP Benefits Amid Shutdown

Fri Oct 31 2025 23:35:57 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

The fate of food aid for millions of Americans hangs in the balance as judges deliberate on whether to continue SNAP benefits during the government shutdown.

As the government shutdown persists, two judges are poised to decide whether SNAP food aid benefits will be replenished for November. Approximately 41 million Americans rely on this aid, but delays may still impact their ability to purchase groceries as the debit cards used for the program face potential funding issues. The hearing raises crucial arguments regarding the legalities of using emergency funds to continue the program, amidst worries from families at risk of food insecurity.

BOSTON (AP) — On Friday, two judges may determine if President Trump's administration must provide SNAP food aid benefits for November, even with the ongoing government shutdown. This decision could affect grocery accessibility for about 41 million Americans, roughly 1 in 8 people.

Despite a judge potentially ruling against the suspension of benefits – a first in SNAP's 61-year history – many families may still face delays in receiving their debit cards, as the processing can take one to two weeks.

During a hearing in Boston, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani expressed skepticism about halting SNAP benefits. She emphasized that if the government lacks funding, an equitable process must be adhered to rather than just suspending aid.

Tightening budget constraints raised the question of whether a contingency fund of $5 billion could legally be used to sustain SNAP, which costs approximately $8 billion monthly. Advocates warn that cutting food aid could force families to make difficult choices between food and paying bills.

Meanwhile, ongoing actions by states to expedite funding for food banks showcase the urgency of the matter amidst growing concerns over food insecurity for low-income families.

As the judges deliberate, all eyes remain on a potential ruling that could set a significant precedent in food assistance legislation amidst federal budget constraints.