A US Navy admiral testified that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth did not give the order to kill them all during a controversial second US military strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean, multiple lawmakers have said. The affirmations by Democratic and Republican lawmakers were made after viewing footage of the 2 September double-strike incident and hearing from Adm Frank Bradley in closed-door hearings. The briefing before members of the House of Representatives and later the Senate came as questions continued around the legality of military force used against suspected drug boats. The White House has said Adm Bradley was responsible for the strikes and that he acted within the law.
On Thursday evening the US military posted on X that it had killed four people in another boat strike in the eastern Pacific Ocean, at Hegseth's direction. Prior to news of the latest strike, lawmakers reacted to the testimony, with the most senior Democrat on the House intelligence committee, Jim Himes, saying Adm Bradley had his respect and should have the respect of all of us. He added: But what I saw in that room was one of the most troubling things I've seen in my time in public service.
The incident raised significant concerns among lawmakers about the protocols and justifications for such strikes. As the narrative unfolds, tensions are building over the legal implications of targeting drug trafficking suspects, especially when it comes to preserving life among the survivors of attacks.
On Thursday evening the US military posted on X that it had killed four people in another boat strike in the eastern Pacific Ocean, at Hegseth's direction. Prior to news of the latest strike, lawmakers reacted to the testimony, with the most senior Democrat on the House intelligence committee, Jim Himes, saying Adm Bradley had his respect and should have the respect of all of us. He added: But what I saw in that room was one of the most troubling things I've seen in my time in public service.
The incident raised significant concerns among lawmakers about the protocols and justifications for such strikes. As the narrative unfolds, tensions are building over the legal implications of targeting drug trafficking suspects, especially when it comes to preserving life among the survivors of attacks.




















