Andre Geim, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist celebrated for his groundbreaking work on graphene, is facing an unexpected twist in his nationality status. After taking British citizenship in 2010 to accept a knighthood, Geim has just learned that he is no longer recognized as a citizen of the Netherlands, a decision made by the Dutch government due to strict dual citizenship laws.
Expressing his frustration, Geim remarked that he felt "extremely annoyed" upon receiving the news. He was informed that he must surrender his Dutch passport at the embassy in London or risk facing consequences from Interpol. Although he has lived and worked in the Netherlands for many years, the recent revelation has prompted him to identify as a “Dutch-British Nobel Prize winner,” placing his Dutch heritage first.
Born in 1958 in Russia to German parents, Geim adopted Dutch citizenship in the 1990s while making significant contributions to physics at Radboud University. In 2010, he and his colleague, Konstantin Novoselov, were awarded the Nobel Prize for their innovations in creating graphene, the world’s strongest material. Geim's allegation that the citizenship revocation is “sad and odd” captures the complex intersection of science, nationality, and personal identity in an increasingly globalized world.
Expressing his frustration, Geim remarked that he felt "extremely annoyed" upon receiving the news. He was informed that he must surrender his Dutch passport at the embassy in London or risk facing consequences from Interpol. Although he has lived and worked in the Netherlands for many years, the recent revelation has prompted him to identify as a “Dutch-British Nobel Prize winner,” placing his Dutch heritage first.
Born in 1958 in Russia to German parents, Geim adopted Dutch citizenship in the 1990s while making significant contributions to physics at Radboud University. In 2010, he and his colleague, Konstantin Novoselov, were awarded the Nobel Prize for their innovations in creating graphene, the world’s strongest material. Geim's allegation that the citizenship revocation is “sad and odd” captures the complex intersection of science, nationality, and personal identity in an increasingly globalized world.
