The recent lawsuit highlights grave allegations brought forward by a Nigerian deportee who, alongside several others, experienced the controversial WRAP device during deportation. Described as akin to being 'kidnapped,' detainees reported being forcibly restrained in the WRAP after already having their hands and feet shackled, often with serious psychological repercussions. Despite the manufacturer’s claim that the device is meant for the safety of officers and detainees alike, many argue it is misused and can lead to severe abuse and harm. ICE's refusal to clarify operating procedures raises further concerns about accountability in its deportation practices, particularly amid increasing scrutiny over immigrant treatment.
Controversial ICE Restraint Device Under Scrutiny Amid Legal Challenges
Controversial ICE Restraint Device Under Scrutiny Amid Legal Challenges
The use of the WRAP, a full-body restraint device by ICE during deportations, raises concerns about human rights and treatment of detainees.
A federal lawsuit reveals unsettling accounts from detainees subjected to the WRAP, an ICE restraint device used during deportations. Its controversial use has sparked discussions on inhuman treatment and civil rights violations. Advocates argue that the WRAP is often used excessively and has not been properly regulated, intensifying calls for reform in immigration practices. This situation follows reports of detainees feeling physically and psychologically harmed during their transportation, igniting a national debate over the ethics of deportation procedures.
