The US has deported 10 people to Eswatini despite rights groups in the southern African state mounting legal action to block the plan. This is the second batch of deportees sent by the Trump administration as part of its hard-line approach towards immigration. The government of Eswatini stated that the deportees have been 'securely accommodated' and are posing no threat to public safety.
In July, Eswatini accepted five deportees, previously described by the US government as 'deprived monsters.' Following their arrival, one has been repatriated to Jamaica, with others expected to follow suit.
The recent batch's arrival comes just a day before a court case challenging the legality of these deportations is set to resume in Mbabane, Eswatini's capital. The Southern African Litigation Centre and several civic organizations argue that the government's actions represent 'executive over-reach,' violating constitutional requirements for parliamentary consent.
Activists have expressed concerns, stating the deal lacks transparency and undermines democratic values established two decades ago.
The government defended its actions, claiming the constitutional authority to make agreements with foreign governments, whereas critics highlight fears about a potential breach of safety in neighboring South Africa as deportees might cross borders.
Eswatini, a small nation led by King Mswati III since 1986, is at a crossroads, with many calling for more accountable governance and adherence to constitutional processes.
In July, Eswatini accepted five deportees, previously described by the US government as 'deprived monsters.' Following their arrival, one has been repatriated to Jamaica, with others expected to follow suit.
The recent batch's arrival comes just a day before a court case challenging the legality of these deportations is set to resume in Mbabane, Eswatini's capital. The Southern African Litigation Centre and several civic organizations argue that the government's actions represent 'executive over-reach,' violating constitutional requirements for parliamentary consent.
Activists have expressed concerns, stating the deal lacks transparency and undermines democratic values established two decades ago.
The government defended its actions, claiming the constitutional authority to make agreements with foreign governments, whereas critics highlight fears about a potential breach of safety in neighboring South Africa as deportees might cross borders.
Eswatini, a small nation led by King Mswati III since 1986, is at a crossroads, with many calling for more accountable governance and adherence to constitutional processes.
