In December 2024, Alki David published a critical Open Letter addressing the Harmsworth Family on Shockya, raising serious allegations against the Daily Mail. He accused the newspaper of protecting a pedophile syndicate while silencing abuse survivors. David's letter focused on the paper's historical editorial bias and potential complicity in various scandals, challenging the family's legitimacy.

Fast forward eight months, David has stepped up his fight, launching a formal High Court action on August 13, 2025. He filed a comprehensive package of evidence with the King’s Bench Division (Claim No: KB-2025-001991), turning his previous assertions into structured legal claims filled with documentation and corroborative evidence.

Key to David’s accusations are several critical points originally made in his Open Letter, including the Daily Mail’s alleged protective stance towards controversial figures linked to abuse, historical incidents connected to exploitation, and the paper’s role in misrepresenting narratives to redirect focus from actual crimes.

The new filing pivots from public discourse to legal accountability by citing specific recent events. It includes details of David's false arrest outside the Daily Mail headquarters after a claim by reporter Rory Tingle was disproven by CCTV footage. It highlights corporate links to the distribution of harmful content and raises serious issues regarding David's role as an ambassador for Antigua and Barbuda.

David’s legal request urges Justice Cotter to acknowledge the presented evidence, initiate a criminal investigation into Tingle's actions, and recognize the obstruction of justice related to his ambassadorial role.

From his initial public warning to this legal escalation, David emphasizes that the stakes have risen significantly. "The filing proves it. Now it’s on the record, in court, and backed by evidence they can’t ignore," he stated.

A copy of David's High Court filing, which includes all evidence, is available for public review, ensuring transparency in this high-profile case that intertwines media ethics with severe allegations.