The Rwandan government has launched legal action against the UK to seek payments it claims it is owed under a scrapped migrant deal between the two countries. Rwanda has filed a case with the Netherlands-based Permanent Court of Arbitration, arguing the UK has failed to honour commitments made in a deal to send some asylum seekers to the African nation. Under the deal, which was signed by the previous Conservative government, the UK agreed to make payments to Rwanda to host asylum seekers and support its economy. But after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer axed the deal in 2024, the Home Office said £220m in 'scheduled future payments will not have to be paid' to Rwanda. The BBC has asked the Home Office for comment, with the prime minister’s spokesman emphasizing the government's commitment to protect British taxpayers. The case follows significant financial implications, as the previous Conservative government reportedly spent around £700m on the Rwanda policy intended to deter migrants from crossing the English Channel. As this legal battle unfolds, both nations await the Permanent Court of Arbitration's ruling.
Rwanda vs UK: Legal Showdown Over Scrapped Migrant Deal

Rwanda vs UK: Legal Showdown Over Scrapped Migrant Deal
Rwanda has initiated legal proceedings against the UK in a bid to claim payments tied to a now-terminated migrant deal aimed at hosting asylum seekers. As tensions rise, what does this mean for future UK immigration policy?
The Rwandan government has filed a case with the Permanent Court of Arbitration against the UK, claiming it is owed funds from a scrapped agreement to send asylum seekers to Rwanda. The UK, under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, annulled the deal, which involved significant monetary commitments from the UK government, citing past financial waste. As the arbitration moves forward, opinions are divided on the consequences of this legal battle on UK taxpayers and future agreements.


















