Australia's landmark social media ban for children is being challenged in the nation's highest court, with two teenagers alleging the law is unconstitutional as it robs them of their right to free communication.
From 10 December, social media firms - including Meta, TikTok and YouTube - must ensure that Australians aged under 16 cannot hold accounts on their platforms.
The law, which is being watched closely around the world, was justified by campaigners and the government as necessary to protect children from harmful content and algorithms.
However, 15-year-olds Noah Jones and Macy Neyland - backed by a rights group - will argue the ban completely disregards the rights of children. We shouldn't be silenced. It's like Orwell's book 1984, and that scares me, Ms Neyland said in a statement.
Communications Minister Anika Wells responded, affirming that the government would not be swayed by threats or legal challenges: We will stand firm on behalf of Australian parents.\
The Digital Freedom Project, which announced the case, emphasizes that teenagers rely on social media for crucial connections and information, especially vulnerable groups like those with disabilities or from remote areas.
Jones criticizes the government’s approach as lazy, calling for protective measures that promote, rather than stifle, digital engagement.
Polls indicate that while many Australian adults support the ban, concerns are growing about its implications for youth connectivity and mental health. A more nuanced approach to online safety is being urged, focusing on digital literacy and privacy instead.

















