Global talks to create a significant treaty addressing plastic pollution have once again faltered. The sixth round of discussions, which was slated to conclude on Thursday, extended late into the night as nations sought to resolve a stalemate. A significant division emerged between approximately 100 countries advocating for reductions in plastic production and those led by oil states, emphasizing recycling initiatives.

Cuban delegates expressed disappointment over the lack of progress, highlighting that the opportunity for a historic agreement was missed. UK Marine Minister Emma Hardy echoed this sentiment, asserting that plastic pollution is a global crisis that requires collective action.

The negotiations, initiated in response to alarming scientific data about the dangers of plastic, come as microplastics are found everywhere—from oceans to human organs. Unfortunately, an initial deadline to finalize a deal by December was already missed, and this latest round has generated even more frustration, especially for island nations like Palau that are disproportionately affected by plastic pollution.

The core disagreement persists: should the treaty focus on stemming production of plastics or enhance waste management? Oil-producing nations, viewing plastics as essential to their economies, argue for better recycling and waste management systems, while environmentalists warn that merely recycling cannot solve the plastics crisis.

A group of around 100 nations, including the UK and European Union, advocates for production curbs in the treaty. They propose simpler designs for plastics to facilitate recycling. In contrast, major oil states expressed dissatisfaction with the negotiations and the proposed treaty text.

While the discussions concluded without a treaty, officials indicated that future negotiations would continue. Environmental groups criticized the session, arguing that fossil fuel interests hinder vital progress in combating plastic pollution. The chair of the discussions announced that talks will resume later, with hope for a stronger consensus moving forward.