The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is to deliver an advisory opinion on Israel's legal obligations towards UN agencies and other international organisations operating in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The UN's top court received a request from the General Assembly late last year, after Israel's parliament passed laws banning any activity by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) on Israeli territory and contact with Israeli officials.
Israel accused Unrwa of being infiltrated by Hamas. The agency denied the claim, insisting it was impartial.
The ICJ was asked to also cover in its opinion Israel's duty to allow the unhindered delivery of essential supplies to Palestinians.
Israel tightened its blockade on Gaza after the start of its war with Hamas two years ago and has since restricted - and at times completely stopped - the entry of food and other aid for the 2.1 million population.
Before this month's ceasefire deal, UN-backed global experts had estimated that more than 640,000 people were facing catastrophic levels of food insecurity and that there was an 'entirely man-made' famine in Gaza City. Israel rejected the findings, insisting it was allowing in sufficient food. It also blames Hamas for stealing aid.
The ICJ's panel of international judges was asked to clarify two questions in the resolution passed by the UN General Assembly in December: firstly, whether Israel's ban on Unrwa breaches UN conventions guaranteeing the independence of UN agencies; and secondly, whether Israel's restrictions on aid crossings into Gaza violate international humanitarian law.
While the opinion will be a non-binding legal clarification, it carries significant moral and diplomatic weight. The hearings began in The Hague in April, and various arguments were presented regarding Israel's obligations and rights.
In response to these proceedings, Israel has described the ICJ involvement as a political circus and claims it undermines its right to self-defense.
Unrwa, the largest humanitarian organisation in Gaza, continues to provide services despite Israel's restrictions, although many staff have faced significant risks during the ongoing conflict.
This hearing is critically significant as it addresses fundamental questions regarding international law and the responsibilities of states in humanitarian crises.
